Showing posts with label 2014 World Cup Qualifying. Show all posts
Showing posts with label 2014 World Cup Qualifying. Show all posts

Ranking the World's Soccer Meccas: No. 2 Estadio do Maracana

For ranking methodology and other information about the series, see the original post. To read the about the No. 3-rated stadiums, Old Trafford and Anfield Road. To see all "soccer mecca" entries click here.


No. 2 Estádio Jornalista Mário Filho (Estádio do Maracanã), Rio de Janeiro
Open Since: 1950
Capacity: Originally said to be 200,000. After renovation for 2014 World Cup this number will be about 85,000
Current Tenant: None. Will be Brazilian national team after renovation.
Past Tenants: "Big Four" Rio de Janeiro clubs (Botafogo, Flamengo, Fluminense, Vasco da Gama), Brazilian cup finals, Rio de Janeiro state championships.
World Cup hosts: 1950, 2014

The Maracana is one of only two stadiums on this list that I have visited in person (the other is the No. 1 ground, whose identity you should be able to figure out at this point if you were paying attention). I was in Rio very recently and took the opportunity to visit the site. Construction site, in this instance. The Maracana is in the middle of a major renovation, its second in a decade, and you can barely get anywhere near it as a result. When I visited, in the middle of August (all photos are from that trip), it was pretty much at the exact midpoint of this overhaul, allowing neither a true sense of what it used to be like, nor a glimpse of what form it would take after the facelift. Even FourFourTwo magazine called it "underwhelming."

They do have a little museum where for 10 reais (about US$5) they show you, well, very little: The "footprints" of a few players, the odd photo and a very obstructed view of the construction going on in the interior. Still, it's the Maracana, a required stop for every soccer fan who ever passes through Rio. The once and future home of the Selecao! The host of one of the most historic World Cup games of all time! As the signature ground of the first postwar World Cup tournament, the Maracana can make a claim to putting the modern game on the map. "What Catholics feel at the Holy Sepulcher, Elvis fans at Graceland and Communists at Lenin's Tomb, soccer fans feel upon sight of Rio de Janeiro's Maracana Stadium," wrote an Israeli journalist. Not visiting was not an option.

Besides, the place has spent large portions of its existence in various states of disrepair. Initial construction wasn't even completed until 1965, according to this BBC story, its sprinkler system had to be overhauled in the 90s and it underwent some pretty extensive renovations last decade. Construction is very much its natural state.

The stadium is in a rather nondescript middle class neighborhood west of downtown. It kind of sneaks up on you as you approach from one of the elevated highways (sadly, that was the best view I got and I didn't act quickly enough to photograph it. But this New York Times story gives you a better perspective anyway). The initial impression is of a massive UFO that decided to park in the middle of the city. It is immense, but not particularly tall, or maybe that's just because I'm used to monstrosities like Met Life Stadium and Citi Field. By 1950 standards it was certainly unrivaled on a global scale. Even in the U.S., serious stadium construction didn't start for another decade or so.

The architecture appears to be of the art deco variety. I say "appears to be" because 1) I couldn't really tell for all the aforementioned reasons, 2) I don't know how to define art deco in the first place and 3) I don't actually know a thing about architecture. It's decidedly modern, how about that? Except wait, that would mean it isn't art deco, right? Whatever. Hopefully none of you are reading this expecting a discourse on architecture.

1950
The Maracana was built for the 1950 World Cup. It was a massive project. The Elon International Studies puts it in perspective:
Building the stadium was one of the biggest human works projects in the history of the city of Rio de Janeiro. Over 11,000 laborers worked on the completion of the stadium with an average of 3,500 men working per day over three shifts. The completion of the stadium took over 8 million man hours of work. To put this in perspective, it would take one man working 6 hours per day 1,860 years to build the stadium. If any man were capable of completing this feat, he would have to have hauled 500,000 bags of cement, 10 tons of iron, 80,000 cubic meters of concrete, 650,000 square meters of timber and 134 million cubic meters of earth into the stadium to complete the task.
(Whoever wrote that piece did not supply a source for those numbers, so take them with a grain of salt if you like.) It was the final game of that tournament that turned the Maracana into such a contentious spot for Brazilian soccer fans. That match, a 2-1 loss to Uruguay, surely remains the most painful event in the history of Brazilian sport. Readers of this blog surely know the story: needing just a draw to win their first World Cup title, the heavily favored Brazilian side took a 1-0 lead shortly after halftime, only to see Uruguay come back with two late goals that shocked the 200,000 in attendance and caused an outpouring of grief and mourning -- and three deaths by heart attack, according to various reports, including this one by Contisoccerworld. Brazilian author Nelson Rodriguez called it "our Hiroshima," presumably without a hint of irony. The event even resulted in the coining of a phrase, Maracanazo. It prompted the selecao to abandon their white kits and switch to the yellow/green/blue familiar to modern fans of the game. None of Brazil's five splendid World Cups since then have completely vanquished the trauma. That will only happen if Brazil win the final of the 2014 World Cup, which will be held at the Maracana. The Brazilians I spoke to were not very keen on that idea at all. It was almost as if the iconic ground still held too many ghosts from 1950, which are better left undisturbed lest they traumatize an entirely new generation of Brazilians.

Of course, there were other famous events that took place at the Maracana, with more favorable outcomes to the Brazilian sides that called it home. Pele's Santos club was not actually one of them, as Santos hails from Sao Paulo, which is different from Rio de Janeiro. The record for most goals scored at Maracana is held by one Zico, who played his club soccer at Rio de Janeiro side Flamengo and scored 333 goals at the storied ground, according to various reports. But Pele still celebrated several milestones including what we are told is his 1,000th goal (links to YouTube video) and his final match for the Brazilian national team. In the final of the 1961 Rio-Sao Paulo championship, Pele scored what came to be known as the gol de placa (worthy of a plaque). FIFA.com describes the goal, and the events surrounding it, in great detail. If you're scoring at home, that's two (2) terms that the Maracana has invented for the Portuguese language.

Soccer nations other than Brazil (and Uruguay) have made their mark on the Maracana. In 1984, England became the first team to defeat Brazil in Rio since 1968. John Barnes scored what the Telegraph has called one of the most memorable goals of all time (presumably from an English perspective).

Amazingly, the Maracana hosted only one Copa Libertadores final, and that was in 2008. It was not a pleasant experience for the home side, in this case Fluminense, who lost on penalties to LDU Quito of Ecuador, a game I watched on tv and reported on in this space (and sadly to say, have absolutely no recollection of).

Besides the 200,000 for the final game of the 1950 World Cup (a world record), the best-attended club soccer game was played here as well. That was the 194,603 for a Flamengo v. Fluminense derby match in 1963. Until and unless standing room terraces are reinstated at a future stadium somewhere, those records will probably stand the test of time.

It will be interesting to see what the Maracana looks like when it finally emerges from its latest, greatest renovation. What will be more interesting will be the new history that is written on the pitch; besides the 2014 final, the stadium will also host four group stage matches, a round of 16 game and quarterfinal. Will Brazil emerge victorious, with the ghosts of 1950 finally put to rest? Or will it usher in a new period of mourning. Either way, the Maracana figures to play a prominent role.

Why failing to qualify for 2014 would be good (yes, good) for US soccer

After losing in Jamaica last night, the U.S. Men's National Team is now in very real danger of crashing out of World Cup qualifying with an embarrassing thud. The scenario, once unthinkable, is now entirely plausible if the U.S. fails to win its remaining home matches, against Jamaica next week and Guatemala in October.

Failing to qualify for Brazil would cause a media bloodbath. The humiliating scenes would in all likelihood lead Sportscenter broadcasts for a solid 24 hours or more. The New York Times, Wall Street Journal and probably even USA Today would run frontage stories. News programs on tv and radio would scramble to line up "experts" to explain what went wrong. Pundits like Steven A. Smith and Jim Rome, who have probably never even mentioned soccer before except maybe in questioning people's manhood, will howl for Jurgen Klinsmann's head. Twitter will alight with hashtags like #USMNTepicfail and #Klinsmannissatan. The blogosphere and Big Soccer sewing circle will melt down.

It would, in short, create the kind of outpouring we never dreamed could occur in this country over a soccer match. Everybody will be talking about it. Friends and family will inquire to our well-being. Hell, some of you may even consider drastic measures to end your suffering (I know who you are and will notify the proper authorities in such instance).

It would be ugly, but it would be beautiful. Because for once, U.S. soccer would dominate the airwaves and watercoolers in a way that got people to maintain their attention. Over the past two decades, quadrennial World Cup games have been little more than diversions from the regular cycle of news and social events. Sure they've attracted notice in increasing numbers, but it's been fleeting, lasting only as long as the tournament itself. This would break that cycle.

Faced with this unprecedented backlash, U.S. soccer would be forced to fire Klinsmann. His successor would have to be a back-to-basics guy preaching the type of uncomplicated defensive style that actually gets results. Klinsmann's uber-sophisticated systems and concepts may have sounded compelling for a little while, but ultimately people will realize the U.S. game wasn't ready for them. America is more of a meat-and-potatoes place anyway. We see no shame in using a little brute force every once in awhile if it gets results (and sorry, road victories in friendly matches really don't count as actual results in the whole scheme of things).

The national team to emerge from this would need to be grounded in fundamentals. A small core would form the nucleus of the squad, allowing younger talent to develop on the periphery. Realizing its strengths, the U.S. would abandon attempts to play like Brazil (or Germany) and focus on establishing itself defensively while allowing space for its superior athletes to assert themselves. Gradually, a true American style would develop organically from this. Klinsmann's vision of creating a U.S. style from the top down was admirable in many ways, but it was also far fetched (and not only because creating things from the top down is decidedly un-American). Ultimately, we prefer to speak softly and carry a big stick. Let's have our style mimic that.

So stress over qualifying as much as you like. In the end, some perspective is needed. If the U.S. fails to qualify for Brazil it will not be the end of the world. Nor will it be the end of soccer in this country. In fact, it may very well prove to be the beginning.