Week 10 Scariness Ratings
I did fairly well on last week's pick, and I considered my adjusted scariness numbers1 in making them, so I’m feeling better about them.
Adjusted Scariness
| Team | Adj Scariness | Rating (Last Week) |
|---|---|---|
| DC United | 3.11 | 1 (3) |
| Chivas | 2.85 | 2 (4) |
| Kansas City | 2.74 | 3 (1) |
| Houston | 2.73 | 4 (6) |
| New York | 1.86 | 5 (2) |
| Dallas | 1.78 | 6 (12) |
| New England | 1.61 | 7 (7) |
| Salt Lake | 1.46 | 8 (9) |
| Toronto | 1.18 | 9 (5) |
| Colorado | 1.01 | 10 (7) |
| Chicago | 0.62 | 11 (11) |
| Los Angeles | 0.39 | 12 (10) |
| Columbus | - 0.25 | 13 (13) |
One thing that I’m getting used to is that there’s a lot of movement on these charts each week. I’m still a bit puzzled by some of the numbers (why in the world is Chivas rated number two??) but overall, I think I’m coming to peace with things.
1 The Adjusted Scariness probably deserves a bit of explanation:
- For each game, I add up the team’s points from a game, the opponents PPG average for the last five games, and add a bonus point for playing on the road, then divide by two to create a value for the game.
- I add the goal differential to the value for each game, to create a modified value.
- Finally, I take a weighted average of the last five modified values (using weightings of .5, .7, .9, 1.1, and 1.3).
0 comments:
Post a Comment